A rule prohibiting children under 16 from using social media has been approved by the Australian House, and noncompliance will result in fines. Critics claim it is ineffectual, while supporters praise it for improving internet safety.

A plan that would prohibit children under 16 from using social media was approved by Australia's House of Representatives on Wednesday; the Senate will now have to complete the world-first legislation.

The law, supported by the major parties, would impose fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars (USD 33 million) on sites like Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Reddit, X, and TikTok for failing to prevent young children from creating accounts.

With 102 votes in favor and 13 votes against, the law was approved. The platforms would have a year to figure out how to apply the age limits before the fines are imposed if the measure is signed into law this week.

Dan Tehan, an opposition MP, informed Parliament that the administration has consented to Senate measures that would strengthen privacy rights. Platforms would be prohibited from requiring users to present official identification papers, such as driver's licenses or passports. Additionally, the platforms were unable to use a government system to require digital identity.

Tehan claimed it will be flawless in Parliament. No. However, is there a law that is flawless? No, it isn't. However, even if it only makes a minor difference, it will have a significant impact on people's lives.

The Senate will discuss the measure later Wednesday, according to Communications Minister Michelle Rowland. Since no party has a majority of members in the Senate, the backing of the main parties almost ensures that the law will be enacted.

During Tuesday and Wednesday's discussion, lawmakers who were not affiliated with the opposition or the administration were the most critical of the bill. Among the criticisms are that the law was hurried through Parliament without sufficient review, that it would not function, that it would jeopardize the privacy of users of all ages, and that it would deprive parents of the power to determine what is best for their children.